Franchisors Do Not Like to Take on 'Entrepreneurs' as Franchisees Essay

Franchisors Do Not Like to Take on 'Entrepreneurs' as Franchisees - Essay Example Global business environment is becoming highly volatile due to constant change in global economic and political environment. It is true that the franchisors are becoming more selective in the adoption of franchisees due to volatile global economic and political environment. Franchisors generally scrutinize each and every aspect before providing franchise as the growth rate of global economy is slowing down.Both franchisors and franchisees get benefits from each from this franchising business. It is quite difficult for a multinational organization to enter into a new global market and starts to make profit from the initial point of time. First, they make the local people aware about their presence in that market. Therefore, the multinational organizations used to find franchisees that can start a new franchisee business with the help of familiarity of the brand name of the franchisor in global market places. In addition to this, knowledge about local market trend and demand helps the franchisee owners to develop a potential client base. Despite all of these things, it can be stated that the franchisees cannot be termed as individual entrepreneurs. There are several reasons and examples to prove this statement. Women who are into their own business, most of them are seen as franchisee rather than entrepreneurship. According to current business environment urban women are more preferable with franchising whereas rural women can be seen as value added enterprising. Joining franchisee by women has been increasing day by day which does not indicates that they are with less potential to come up with any value added business by their own. It is just because women are less likely to be trying for doing everything from start-up by their own as an entrepreneurship. Therefore, they like to run an established or running business which a franchisor can provide for those women who are not from business family. Therefore, today’s women entrepreneurship stands mainly on franchisee business where there is zero value addition by themselves as any entrepreneur. Hence, the statement is very true in this case (Webber, 2013, p.71-76).  

Final Exam Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 3

Final Exam - Essay Example Homosexuals and lesbians are allowed to adopt children, while this was never acceptable before the 19th century. Americans came to realize that dissent is good for the nation. Through opposition, the country can identify the areas that need change, and the right direction through which the change should be guided. Eventually, American culture evolved into various subcultures based on people’s opinions and practices. American culture became heterogeneous. This paper will describe how the modern changes of the late 19th and 20th centuries contributed to a fragmented and heterogeneous culture. In the early 19th century backwards to the early centuries, the society was divided into two sections; between the rich and the poor. There were physical divisions as well as divisions based on values and ideas. The rich thought that they were untouchable, and it was the responsibility of the poor man to take a lower position in the society, for him to be rich and stay on top. The rich thought that the poor had no right to fight for freedom or try to get rich. The society according to them was perfect as it was. They had accumulated enough wealth to keep them on top for periods of time. Any grievances by the poor people were considered a nuisance, ridiculous, and an obstacle to achieving the aims of the rich. A rich person, for example, in the 1880s or even before, could have had aims of building a new home or constructing new working sites. Workers’ strikes at the time would be a nuisance because they disrupted the progress of such projects. To them, whatever the poor were fighting for was impossible. The perception of strikes at the time is that strikes were a nuisance; they were a waste of the employers’ time and money. They were a threat to the society. The perception of strikes in the current society, however, is different. It is viewed as people fighting for their rights and it is also considered legally right. The class structure in the early centuries